Friday, March 31, 2006 

In Honor of César Chávez - ¡Sí, Se Puede!

En memoria de César Chávez - ¡Sí, Se Puede!

¡Para Paz, Justicia y Libertad!

I Am Joaquin (abridged)
by Rodolfo Corky Gonzales

Yo soy Joaquín,
perdido en un mundo de confusión:
I am Joaquín, lost in a world of confusion,
caught up in the whirl of a gringo society,
confused by the rules, scorned by attitudes,
suppressed by manipulation, and destroyed by modern society.
My fathers have lost the economic battle
and won the struggle of cultural survival.
And now! I must choose between the paradox of
victory of the spirit, despite physical hunger,
or to exist in the grasp of American social neurosis,
sterilization of the soul and a full stomach.
Yes, I have come a long way to nowhere,
unwillingly dragged by that monstrous, technical,
industrial giant called Progress and Anglo success....
I look at myself.
I watch my brothers.
I shed tears of sorrow. I sow seeds of hate.
I withdraw to the safety within the circle of life --
MY OWN PEOPLE

I was both tyrant and slave.
As the Christian church took its place in God's name,
to take and use my virgin strength and trusting faith,
the priests, both good and bad, took--
but gave a lasting truth that Spaniard Indian Mestizo
were all God's children.
And from these words grew men who prayed and fought
for their own worth as human beings, for that
GOLDEN MOMENT of FREEDOM.


More below the fold

I am Joaquin.
I rode with Pancho Villa,
crude and warm, a tornado at full strength,
nourished and inspired by the passion and the fire of all his earthy people.
I am Emiliano Zapata.
"This land, this earth is OURS."
The villages, the mountains, the streams
belong to Zapatistas.
Our life or yours is the only trade for soft brown earth and maize.
All of which is our reward,
a creed that formed a constitution
for all who dare live free!
"This land is ours . . .
Father, I give it back to you.
Mexico must be free. . . ."
I ride with revolutionists
against myself.

Depending on the time and place.
I am faithful, humble Juan Diego,
The Virgin of Guadalupe,
Tonantzín, Aztec goddess, too.
I rode the mountains of San Joaquín.
I rode east and north
As far as the Rocky Mountains,
And
All men feared the guns of
Joaquín Murrieta.
I killed those men who dared
To steal my mine,
Who raped and killed my love
My wife.
Then I killed to stay alive.

Hidalgo! Zapata!
Murrieta! Espinozas!
Are but a few.
They dared to face
The force of tyranny
Of men who rule by deception and hypocrisy.
I stand here looking back,
And now I see the present,
And still I am a campesino,
I am the fat political coyote–
I,
Of the same name,
Joaquín,
In a country that has wiped out
All my history,
Stifled all my pride,
In a country that has placed a
Different weight of indignity upon my age-old burdened back.
Inferiority is the new load . . . .
The Indian has endured and still
Emerged the winner,
The Mestizo must yet overcome,
And the gachupín will just ignore.
I look at myself
And see part of me
Who rejects my father and my mother
And dissolves into the melting pot
To disappear in shame.
I sometimes
Sell my brother out
And reclaim him
For my own when society gives me
Token leadership
In society's own name.

I have endured in the rugged mountains
Of our country
I have survived the toils and slavery of the fields.
I have existed
In the barrios of the city
In the suburbs of bigotry
In the mines of social snobbery
In the prisons of dejection
In the muck of exploitation
And
In the fierce heat of racial hatred.
And now the trumpet sounds,
The music of the people stirs the
Revolution.
Like a sleeping giant it slowly
Rears its head
To the sound of
Tramping feet
Clamoring voices
Mariachi strains
Fiery tequila explosions
The smell of chile verde and
Soft brown eyes of expectation for a
Better life.

I am the masses of my people and
I refuse to be absorbed.
I am Joaquín.
The odds are great
But my spirit is strong,
My faith unbreakable,
My blood is pure.
I am Aztec prince and Christian Christ.
I SHALL ENDURE!
I WILL ENDURE!


Read more!

Tuesday, March 28, 2006 

Houston, We Have A Problem!

Inspired by the multiple school walkouts happening around the nation that was brought on by the Nation's immigrant tormenter, Houston's teens also choose to send a clear message to the Nation and especially Texas' very own immigrant tormenter. Even though the numbers were not into the thousands, the rally did surprise Houston's politicos as students from more than four high schools in and around the Houston area marched against HR4437, the bill that planned to turn 12 million undocumented residents into felons and build a Chinese-like "Great Wall" of isolation and exclusion only between the United States and Mexico.

Their message to Houston and the Nation was clear. Summing up the sentiments many are feeling, High School for Law Enforcement student Joe Mendoza was quoted on Houston's Indy Media saying:
"Latinos unidos, jamas seran vencidos," as students chanted in unison as they showed their pride. "Look around at all these buildings around us (in downtown) these buildings are kept they way they are because of us immigrants, this city knows that we are needed here for things to work and we are not afraid of these laws. We are not going anywhere. We are not criminals."
The question remains, where are the local leaders of Houston to counter the hate that has been spewed from anti-immigration foes. Sadly, not one Houston politicos has stepped up and taken any type of leadership role. The rallies that occured in two of the country's largest cities was organizied in a colaboration, yet the leaders have refused to step up and organize any mass protest. Sure the embattled Council Member Carol Alvarado came out and gave her sad "I endorse you" good job rhetoric, but the truth is, she had too, to fix her reputation or she really would look as if she is out of touch with her community. But the other question is where was Council Member Adrian Garcia has he abandoned his constituents as he fail to support the students. And now Houston's first Hispanic HISD Superintendent, Dr. Abelardo Saavedra just following the company political line and has decided to enact some draconian measure on those student who excersied their right to protest.

More below the fold

Considering CM Alvarado's Mayor Pro-Tem Office of Coruption has been making head lines recently, one would think she would really show support and fight her the students who are about to get into trouble. Instead, CM Alvarado has down played this rally and robbed them of their voice as she told the students that the city didn't have authority over federal immigration policy.
Alvarado, whose district includes Austin High, explained to the students that the city doesn't have authority over federal immigration policy.
But she is not the only one who stated the same thing, Mayor Bill White also gave the students "what can the city do" BS line.
The [Mayor White] said he appreciates all the work the students are doing to get their message out, but he admitted it is a federal issue.
It is obvious that both Alvardo and White have failed to see that the immigration fight isn't over yet and demanding support from their government. But instead just placated to the students figured if the student leaders could meet the Mayor things would be alright.

Mayor White, CM Alvarado, Gracia, and the rest of the state and local party should for have taken lessons from their counter-parts in Los Angeles and Chicago in leadership during a time that xenophobia is on the rise. Neither Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Mayor Richard Daley went out and said the city didn't have authority over federal immigration. In fact, both Mayors pledged to protect those who were undocumented.

Mayor Richard M. Daley said:
"This is a fight that includes every American. Those who are here undocumented, we're not going to make criminals out of them. That is not what America has ever stood for and will not stand for."
Mayor Villaraigosa, a son of Mexican immigrants, former labor activist, and LA's first Hispanic Mayor told the protestors in front of City Hall:
"We cannot criminalise people who are working, people who are contributing to our economy and contributing to the nation."

No, Houston's leadership truely receives an F on the day students where looking for their government's leader to take a stand. Many adults feel that these students don't really know what really is going and used this as an excuse to ditch. But as Adrian Mora, student at LA's Avalon High School, elloquently put it:
"They may look at us [students] and think we're dumb, but we're just here to help the people we love."
Currently there are talks that these students will now face punishment from their schools for having participated in the protest and yet, nobody has spoken out against this. Given that the Senate is still debating there is still a chance the laws can still change their lives by making them criminals out of them and their families. According Arminius, immigration lawyer and activist, the recent vote still doesn't mean all immigrants are safe.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) is brought to us by Richard Mellon Scaife, the same asshole who bankrolled the Clinton investigations and impeachment. They have HUGE resources. They get HUGE play on the coopted national media. Their frontline current spokesman is Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo, who is just the next in line after guys like Lamar Smith of Texas. They've been building this incredibly punitive anti-foreigner law for a long time.....these hearings today, and the debates the rest of the week, are a FUCKING SHAM! We went through a similar process, at a lower temperature, in 1996, and we got the IIRAIRA bill, to date the most punitive ant-immigrant law in history. That was written by FAIR lawyers in the conference. The final bill, which became LAW after Clinton signed it, didn't look anything at all like what passed the houses of Congress.

Congress this time will be restrained a little bit by the huge demonstrations. But the final bill may be a lot worse than what is reported today.
So is this how the HISD pays them back for excersing their right to protest. But then again this is the same school disctrict that purchased Neil Bush's Ignite Learning program which 40 being used in the Houston area.

Neil's product "The COW," a built-in projector, curriculum content, and script for teachers does come pre-loaded with all of Ignite!'s Science or Social Studies courses. And here is a clip from the outline of the Social Studies Curriculum.
Understanding Our Democracy - The Rights and Responsibilities of the Citizen 1787-Present
Three Branches
States' Rights
The Influences of Factions
The Electoral Process
Constitutional Amendments
How a Bill Becomes a Law
The Individual vs the State
Limited Freedom of Speech
Sacrificing for the Greater Good
Voting
The Media
Protest and Civil Disobedience
It may just look like the part informing them of their right to protest has gone down the memory hole just like the rest of the Constitution.

Many Texas Democrats complained that the a large portion of the Hispanic community voted for Dudya, and now is their chance to win them back. But of course not, it is not their issue to fight because its the belief of the Democratic Party to let the Republican's fight themselves over it. That is some way to win back the Party's lost votes.

It's time for the Houston leadership to take a stand!



Read more!

Monday, March 27, 2006 

Beyond the Band-aides

It is time to start looking deep within ourselves and really look at the problem of the divide here in the United States. Yesterday, at ePluribus Media a question was asked in regards to the lack of a true progressive representation at yesterday's march that was held in LA, Where were the progressives from outside of the Latino community today?

A diary written in Booman Tribune by Eternal Hope, Sickening: Kossacks supporting the Minutemenm confirms the claims made by another Booman Tribune diariest Man Eegee, Gut-Check Time on Immigration.

I felt the comment I made in Eternal Hope's diary really needed to be addressed if we really are wanting to heal this country.
As long as this issue is sweep under the rug and labeled "[not] my issue" to defend, then there will never be a true disscussion. There have been too many band-aides to this wound and people refuse to see the hemorrhaging that is taking place.
We had our chance to address many of these issues right after Hurricane Katrina, during Chief Justice Roberts' and Justice Alito's confirmation but we failed. The country did what it does best, just place more band-aides over the problems and hope it does not come up again. It is time to say BASTA!!!

Back to the question that was asked, "Where were the progressives from outside of the Latino community today?" the fact is, this question has been asked not just by Hispanics, but also Feminist, African Americans, Native Americans, the working class, the pro-Union, disability rights advocates and many others that is suppose to emcompass the liberal/progressive movement.

Whenever a minority or a gender issue is raised, it is often dismissed as a single issue and self-serving. It is damaging because because if complaints are made, they are often dismissed as making something out of nothing as we have seen over and over again.

More below the fold

The immigration issue is not only about racism, but it is also sexism and classism. Whenever an issue dealing with race or gender needs to be addressed, we as individuals become so afraid talk about it because it might reveal we to are contributing to the problem, which would require admitting to ourselves we do have our prejudices when it comes to ethnic, race, gender, social economic, and disability issues.

If we do not address the source that is causing this divide, how are we to address the moral juxtaposition that continues to divide America. The source of this moral delema are the messages we receive from society, and this is the crux of the problem. It is these messages that are shaping our view on any group.

Let's take the immigration issue. Fact is, immigration emcompasses all other immigrant communities, not just Hispanics. But, the message that was given out to the public is that Hispanics are the ones who have intensified many existing social problems and created a number of new ones. The immigrantion debate revolves around two issues; one, "the war on terrorism" and the other, on a myth - La Reconquista, Mexico's plan to take back its lost territory. In my blog, I wrote about the America's cruel history of deportation in the 20th century, which is now into the 21st century. HR4437 talks about building a wall, and where will this wall be built? On the US-Mexico border, yet, nobody feels threaten by Canadians, even though the hijackers came through Canada.

From the State Department:
Who from Canada and Mexico, Needs a Nonimmigrant Visa to Enter the United States Temporarily?
Canada
Citizens of Canada do not require a visa, except as described below.

Canadian citizens travelling to the US for these purposes require nonimmigrant visas:
  • foreign government officials (A);
  • officials and employees of international organizations (G),;
  • NATO officials, representatives and employees if s if they are being assigned to the U.S. (as opposed to an official trip).
Mexico
Citizens and permanent residents of Mexico generally must have a nonimmmigrant visa or Border Crossing Card (also known as a "Laser Visa"). The Border Crossing Card, Form DSP-150 is a biometric, machine readable, visitor B1-B2 visa/Border Crossing Card that may be used to enter the U.S. from within the Western Hemisphere. Select Border Crossing Card to learn more about the requirements for this card.
To someone like me, a Xicano/Mexican-American/Hispanic/Latino, this is out right racism and a double standard.

Take a look at a study done last year, "Network Brownout Report," by the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.
  • One out of every three Latino stories (34.7 percent) was about immigration in 2004. More than one hour of coverage was devoted to the topic, making up almost a third (31.6 percent) of the total time (three hours 25 minutes) devoted to Latino stories.
  • Half of all Latino stories (58 out of 115 stories) did not feature an interview with a Latino.
  • Latino coverage lacked depth, with one third (33 percent) of all stories lasting 30 seconds or less.
  • Out of 115 Latino stories, 47 (41 percent) featured visual images of groups of unidentified Latinos. Of the 47 stories, 31 (66 percent) featured immigrants, including images of illegal border crossings.
  • A significant proportion of Latino stories lacked diversity of opinion. Of 115 stories, more than one third (41 stories) did not cite a single source. Of the stories using sources, 40 percent (46 stories) presented mostly one perspective.
Immigration was a central theme in much of the networks' coverage, regardless of story topic. Most immigration stories focused on undocumented immigration. Many showed images of unidentified groups of undocumented immigrants crossing the border illegally or being arrested by the U.S. Border Patrol.
  • Overall, Latinos were viewed as problem people and burdens to society in 2004.
  • Stories on Latinos and politics focused on the use of Spanish by the presidential candidates and portrayed Latinos as a monolithic group of voters. Issues important to Latinos were virtually ignored.
  • Networks continued to use the theme of the American dream to frame stories about Latinos, without providing more substantive coverage.
The country is undergoing an historic demographic shift, yet network coverage has failed to explain this change and its impact on our society. We fear viewers watching the network news have learned very little about the Latino community since we issued our first Network Brownout Report in 1996.

What viewers have learned is that too often Latinos are portrayed as problem people living on the fringes of U.S. society. Rarely do we see stories about the positive contributions of Latinos.
The issue of classism can be found within the Hispanic community because more affluent Hispanics separate themselves from undocumented immigrants. Sure, Hispanics will advocate for Hispanic rights, but there is also a fine line. I wonder how many affluent Hispanics attended any of the recent pro-immigration/anti-HR4437/anti-S.2454 rallies? I would imagine a few, it is not their "problem." And yet it is.

There are also gender issues, such as, the gender role for women change drastically when they arrive to the US because it counters many of their cultural values. From a study, Gender(ed) Migrations: Shifting Gender Subjectivities in a Transnational Mexican Community, conducted by Deborah A. Boehm at the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies:
Without question, women in the United States exercise flexible and diverse roles, and are redefining femininity and what it means to be a woman. Teresa, for example, has a life that is quite distinct from her previous life in Mexico. In Mexico, she tells me that she was constantly in her home doing domestic chores, and that her family struggled because they had so little money. Today, Teresa works full-time for a clothing manufacturer, and she is responsible for many public interactions--with her children's teachers and doctors, the family's immigration attorney, bank tellers, and her realtor, among others. But while Teresa finds herself in spheres that are entirely new for her, and in charge of important family business, she still is the one who must do everything in the home. Her teenage daughters help with the load, but her husband and son do not. Teresa tells me that she is exhausted. She says that she has even purchased a daily planner-- something she thought was ridiculous when she first saw a co-worker using one. But now, she explains,  her life is so hectic that she is lucky to just get by.
Immigration also deals with labor issues and many other issues. The question must be asked, when gender issues are brought up, how often are immigrants included in the debate? The same thing can be asked about labor issues. May union members feel threaten they are losing blue collar jobs to undocumented workers, why not bring them in or help organize so they too can be protected under labor rights. Obviously it is possible to organize, if not, how does one explain the success of the United Farm Workers.

There are many who call themselves liberal and are quick to recite Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. when it comes to civil rights, but MLK was also an anti-war activist.

From Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s November 1967 speech at the National Labor Leadership Assembly for Peace:
Now what are some of the domestic consequences of the war in Vietnam? It has made the Great Society a myth and replaced it with a troubled and confused society...It has given the extreme right, the anti-labor, anti-Negro, and anti-humanistic forces a weapon of spurious patriotism to galvanize its supporters into reaching for power, right up to the White House. It hopes to use national frustration to take control and restore the America of social insecurity and power for the privileged. When a Hollywood performer, lacking distinction even as an actor can become a leading war hawk candidate for the Presidency, only the irrationalities induced by a war psychosis can explain such a melancholy turn of events.

At this moment tens of thousands of people and anti-poverty programs are being abruptly thrown out of jobs and training programs to search in a diminishing job market for work and survival. It is disgraceful that a Congress that can vote upwards of $35 billion a year for a senseless immoral war in Vietnam cannot vote a weak $2 billion dollars to carry on our all too feeble efforts to bind up the wound of our nations 35 million poor. This is nothing short of a Congress engaging in political guerilla warfare against the defenseless poor of our nation.

When I first decided to take a firm stand against the war in Vietnam, I was subjected to the most bitter criticism, by the press, by individuals, and even by some fellow civil rights leaders. There were those who said that I should stay in my place, that these two issues did not mix and I should stick with civil rights. Well I had only one answer for that and it was simply the fact that I have struggled too long and too hard now to get rid of segregation in public accommodations to end up at this point in my life segregating my moral concerns.
Often called the Latino Martin Luther King, like King, Cesar Chavez also advocated for civil rights and economic justice for all people. Before MLK was assassinated, MLK sent a telegram commending Chavez's public "fast" to protest the violence taking place during the Famous Delano Grape Strike. MLK wrote:
"You and your valiant fellow workers have demonstrated your commitment to righting grievous wrongs forced upon exploited people. We are together with you in spirit and determination that our dreams for a better tomorrow will be realized." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
I wonder what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would say about the current state of affairs and our divide?

Instead of asking where were the rest of the progressives, I ask you this:
How could we progress as a society and talk about civil liberties, yet allow millions of immigrant families be condemned to a life without pride?

How could we progress as a people while immigrants here in the US are being denied their self-respect?

But most of all, how can you believe that your child can become lawyers and doctors and judges and business people while this shame, this injustice is permitted to continue?


Technorati : , , , , , , , , , ,


Read more!

Wednesday, March 22, 2006 

Mystery Gov. Workers Posing As Journalists And Secret Service Agents

On March 18, Washington Post writes: The White House said yesterday that it will discipline two government employees who masqueraded as journalists this month while scouting locations for a presidential visit to the Gulf Coast.

They identified themselves as Fox News journalists when they were checking out their neighborhood before Bush's visit and later claimed they were with the Secret Service.
"They didn't show any cards or anything," [Elaine] Akins said. "They just came up and said they were with the media, and then they said they were with Fox. They just talked to us and asked us about rebuilding our house. Then, after everything was over with, they approached us and they were laughing, and they said: 'You know, we really weren't with Fox. We're government, Secret Service men."
The White House confirms it:
"This incident has been brought to our attention, and this is clearly not appropriate, nor is it part of our standard operating procedures," [Ken Lisaius, White House spokesman] said. "The individuals involved will be verbally reprimanded."
However, the Secret Service have never seen the two "Secret Service men" and are not part of the Secret Service either.
"I checked with our people down there in Mississippi who were involved in the advance, and it was not Secret Service people who identified themselves as members of the media," [Tom Mazur, a spokesman for the Secret Service] said. "We wouldn't do that."
When the Post called the White House again, Lisaus would not tell them anything about the two men were, just that the White House is aware of the matter. So it looks like the White House likes to sidestep the Secret Service and send their own personnel who like to run around impersonating journalist and the Secret Service.

I find it interesting, the Post made no mention that impersonating a federal law enforcement officer is a violation of federal law (18 U.S.C. §912).
Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
But this is not the first time that the White House has tried to cover-up someone impersonating an agent pf the Secret Service. Last year, in Denver, at a Social Security town hall meeting, three individuals, Alex Young, Karen Bauer, and Leslie Weise ("Denver 3"), were forcibly removed by someone impersonating a Secret Service agent. Although the Secret Service launched a criminal investigation into the matter, the White House refused to provide the name of the person who was posing as a Secret Service agent, however, justified the removal of the "Denver 3."
Amidst White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan’s stonewalling, contradictory explanations, and refusal to reveal the man’s identity, McClellan announced last week that suspicion is all the White House needs to forcibly remove Americans from an official Presidential event and deny them their constitutional rights.
The Associated Press later reported on the results of the investigation:
An agent from Washington, D.C., contacted [Dan] Recht and asked if his clients Alex Young, Karen Bauer, and Leslie Weise could be interviewed this week as part of the second investigation into the incident, Recht said. The Secret Service has said the first investigation determined the man was not one of its agents but a staff member with the host committee.
More frightening, it was a Republican staffer who posed as the Secret Service and it seems they do it very often.
[Lon] Garner, [the Secret Service agent in charge in Denver,] said his investigation found that the man was a Republican Party staffer and "not a Secret Service agent." He referred further questions to his Washington office.

The group said Garner also told them there have been numerous cases of Republican staffers holding themselves out as Secret Service agents at presidential appearances.
I guess the White House "Volunteer" program are now the "advance sweeper teams" making sure King George's loyal subjects haven't turned on him.
[Elaine] Akins said the men were friendly and looked around the home site for about 20 minutes. The following Wednesday, Bush flew to the small, working-class town. He appeared with Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) outside the Akins home to call attention to federal efforts to aid in reconstruction.

"Our job and our purpose is to help people like the Akins rebuild," Bush said.
It was during McCarthism when people became targets of Senator McCarthy's aggressive "witch-hunts," but now, it's any dissenter of King George.

UPDATE: Hat tip to Duke for his comment over at ePluribus Media where this is also x-posted. The whole idea of "volunteers" is very similar to the old Nazi SS, Nazi stormtroops or otherwise known as often known as brownshirts.
The predecessor to the SS was first formed in 1923 as a company of the Sturmabteilung (SA) tasked with protecting senior leaders of the Nazi Party at rallies, speeches and other public events. Commanded by Emil Maurice, and known as the Stabswache (Staff Guard), the original group consisted of 8 men and was modeled after the Erhardt Naval Brigade, a violent Freikorps of the time.

After the failed 1923 Putsch by the Nazi Party, the SA and the Stabswache were abolished, yet returned in 1925. At that time the Stabswache was reestablished as the Stosstrupp Adolf Hitler tasked with the personal protection of Hitler at Nazi Party functions and events. That same year, the Stosstrupp was expanded to a national level, and renamed as the Schutzstaffel. The new SS was delegated to be a protection company of various Nazi Party Leaders throughout Germany.
And we should not forget, Bush's grandfather, US senator Prescott Bush, was a Nazi.
George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.
However, isn't it interesting, the US had it's own Nazi Party, started by William Dudley Pelley, founder of the Silver Shirts, AKA Silver Legion of America.
The Silver Legion of America, commonly known as the Silver Shirts, was an American Nazi organization founded by William Dudley Pelley on January 30, 1933. Many believe that Pelley's choice of the name was an obvious reference to the German SS.

The Silver Legion’s emblem was a scarlet 'L', it stood for Loyalty to the American Republic, Liberation from materialism and, of course, the Silver Legion itself. Their uniforms consisted of a cap identical to those worn by German Stormtroopers, blue corduroy trousers, leggings, tie and silver shirt with a red "L" over the heart.

History does have a tendency of repeating itself.



Technorati : , , , , ,


Read more!

Tuesday, March 21, 2006 

Viva La Raza!


Read more!

Monday, March 20, 2006 

America's Cruel History of Mass Deportation and The Reasons Used

America has a long history when it comes to mass deportation. In fact, American capitalism has used Mexican workers as a reserve army of labor since the conquest of the Southwest.

History has shown the Mexican labor pool is heavily utilized during times of economic boom and repatriation during economic downturns. To American capitalist the border does not exist when it comes to exploitation. When it comes to minimum wage requirements, health care benefits, workman's compensation insurance, and social security plans, both Migrant workers and employees of American firms in Mexico have always been excluded.

During the 20th century, US companies have regularly enlisted the aid of hired thugs, local law enforcement, and state agencies like the Texas and Arizona Rangers to overtly suppressed the Mexican labor.

World War I and The Great Depression
During World War I, there was a great need for labor, as America was sending 150,000 troops a month to serve in Europe. To meet the labor needs, immigration quotas for Mexico were ignored. Labor recruiters were bringing in Mexican labors to keep the American economy afloat. But when the war was over and the Depression hit, it was a different story.

The first mass deportation occured during The Great Depression, when Mexican and Mexican American, along with African Americas and other minorities were the targets of America's woes. The anti-immigrant hysteria led to the mass deportation of roughly 300,000 Mexican workers and their families, many of them also included US born children.

Over the next 10 years, the Mexican population in the US dropped by 40%. Twelve states - Colorado, Illinois, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Wisconsin, and Wyoming - all lost over half of its Mexican population, while Indiana lost three-fourths.

The way the mass deportations on Mexican migrants was heartless. Deportees lost their personal property, automobiles, homes, businesses, and other investments in America. They were not even given time to prepare for their leave. Deportation was instant. The deportation campaign divided families. Children were torn from their schools, neighborhoods, and friends. Some of the children were shipped off with their parents or other relatives, and sometimes on their own. Deportees and their families were routinely transported to the nearest border town and force-marched across the international bridge by armed Border Patrol Agents or National Guard troops and warned never to return.

The Bracero Program and Operation Wetback
In August 1942, the US was in another war. To meet the labor demands, the US and Mexico created the Bracero program which brought an estimated 4 or 5 million Mexican nationals to work in the US. But once the War was over, it was time to send them back home. The US war against North Korea in 1950 sparked another labor shortage, like the Great Depression, caused a backlash and led to Operation Wetback, one of the worst reactionary US policies against Mexican people in the US.

The second wave of mass deportations of Mexican workers and their families occurred at the end of the Korean War. Under the command of retired General Joseph Swing, commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) under President Eisenhower, Gen. Swing conducted a military campaign to roundup and deport all Mexican migrants. It is difficult to estimate how many Mexicans were deported, but the INS claimed over 1,000,000, five times as many immigrants as were deported during the Great Depression.

Arguments Used
Interesting, the arguments that are used today are very similar to the language used back then. While arguing for a quota system in 1929 before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization of the U.S. House of Representatives, Congressman Eugene Black said Mexicans were, "germ-carriers, inassimilable, a people who are with us but not of us, and not for us." Such language can be found on Fox's The O'Reilly Factor. On April 2005, one of O'Reilly's callers said: "that the illegals crossing the border...each one of those people is a biological weapon."

During Operation Wetback, anti-immigration pundits argued Operation Wetback was needed because our borders were in danger because of the large number of "illegal aliens" in the US. This language can be found throughout the internet today, such as the racist web sit VDARE.COM who is advocating for Operation Wetback to return:
On VDARE.COM you can find out how to report illegal aliens in both English and Spanish. But in the internet age, the new millennium, the post-9/11 world, or whatever you want to call it, the INS still does not have any way for the public to report illegal aliens through a web site - or even through e-mail!

It looks as if history does repeat itself. Will the US continue opening it's doors when it is in search of cheap labor, but throw them out whenever there is a problem.

The "use them and lose them" policy of the US must stop!


Read more!

Friday, March 17, 2006 

Michelle Malkin Wish Comes True

Two years ago, Michelle Malkin wrote a couple of books, which one of them was titled
In Defense of Internment: The Case for "Racial Profiling" in World War II and the War on Terror. The book is just more of the same propaganda, but trying to sound scholarly than the one word titles that the other lunatic shrill queen uses, such as Slander or Treason. All Malkin does in her book is defended internment camps and racial profiling.

On Tuesday, Malkin got her wish. Fatherland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff plans to open up some Gitmo-lite camps...oops I mean "detention facilities" to hold thousands of Chinese immigrants who have been denied immigration to the United States. And in October Chertoff plans to end its "catch and release" immigration policy which would mean that all illegal immigrants will be held in U.S. detention centers. So to sum it up, Hispanic are kicked out, Muslims are held secretly, and Chinese will be held in camps and later on, after October everybody else the US doesn't like can spend the night at Camp Internment.

The problem with right wing lunatics is that they find it hard to face up to the fact that it's not America we hate, it's the bigots and fascist who wrap themselves in their hateful, bigoted, ignorant ideology in red, white and blue.

People like them are very dangerous and should be taken very seriously. They are not only intolerant and self-righteous, but disdain any criticism and are willingly resort to violence in response to any threat to their dominance.

Some facts from a study regarding migrant workers from the same state Rep. Sensenbrenner is from, Economic Impact of Migrant Workers on Wisconsin’s Economy.

Over 90 percent of Wisconsin migrants are of Spanish speaking origin. They are primarily from the Rio Grande Valley in south Texas, although some come directly from Mexico and other countries.

Hand labor is still needed in the cucumber industry, in apple orchards, and in picking peppers, cabbage, and other vegetable crops that have not been mechanized. Also, because many crops are processed and canned in the state, large numbers of workers are needed in food processing plants during the peak of harvest. Today, as in many past years, Wisconsin ranks first among the states in the production of snap beans for processing (USDA, 2001).

Farm wives used to help during harvest; now many are likely to have year-round, off- farm jobs. High school students who used to help during the vacation summer months now may get employment in comfortable airconditioned malls, stores, and restaurants. Thus, employers turn to out-of-state, seasonally available workers.

Farmers and food producers were asked "Please indicate what you would do if migrant labor were not available." There is no worry among food processors but farmers are a different story. Growers differ significantly from food processors:
  1. would be more likely to close their business (49% v. 8%);
  2. to go into other lines of work (28% vs. 0%);
  3. sell their land or equipment (28% vs. 0%); and
  4. they would retire (12% vs. 0%)
Conclusion:
Local economies depend on migrant workers in numerous ways. As a reliable and hardworking workforce, employers count on them to help plant, harvest and pack perishable produce, work double shifts in canneries, and accept wages that are above minimum but below a "living wage."

While in Wisconsin, migrants spend about half of their pay checks for various living expenses, such as food and clothes. This money is usually spent in local stores, thus re-entering the local economy. Migrants also make special purchases while in Wisconsin, which average $750 for a worker traveling alone, and over $1,100 for a family, and may include a used car, stereo and VCR, various home appliances and computers.

In sum, the migrant workforce continues to play a significant role in Wisconsin agriculture, its food industries, and its economy as a whole. Moreover, due to migrants’ spending in the state and the tax revenues that migrants make possible, there are significant positive economic impacts of migrant workers and their families in the State of Wisconsin.
The sad thing is, farmers are starting to feel the effects. The Bluefield Daily Telegraph ran this story: Farmers Face Immigrant Workers Shortage
Randy Scarbor was counting on the 15 immigrant workers who lived on his farm to harvest his 60-acre sweet-potato crop last fall, but they vanished just as the work got under way. He instead was forced to bring in some less-motivated substitutes for the backbreaking job.

"I wound up hiring some locals that weren't worth hauling to the field," he said. "It was the worst harvest labor in my life and I've been in the farming business 35 years. But we got it in."
...
some farm groups also believe increased enforcement along Mexican border also may have curbed the number of illegal immigrants with false documents that get "entry-level" jobs like picking fruits and vegetables. There are also indications anti-immigrant civilian groups such as the Minutemen have discouraged farm workers who could enter the country legally.
And it even gets better....
a Farm Bureau study predicts one-third of the nation's fruit-and-vegetable producers would no longer be able to compete with foreign growers, U.S. agriculture would lose $9 billion a year and U.S. consumers eventually would be left with only foreign-grown produce in their supermarkets.

Of the nation's 3 million agricultural workers, about 2 million are members of farm families and 1 million are hired, including an estimated 500,000 who aren't authorized to work in this country, according to the Farm Bureau.

Funny how the xenophobic lunatics over at the Center for Immigration Studies think things can be solved only if farmers are willing to pay competitive wages.

California's Imperial Valley Vegetable Growers Association, says different and they are feeling the effects NOW!
Labor shortage is very real for farmers in the valley, a desert region north of the Mexican border with 450,000 acres of irrigated farmland. The Imperial Valley supplies 90 percent of the nation's winter vegetables, such as lettuce, spinach and broccoli....The increased border security, plus rumors about border vigilantes, was so intimidating that even workers who could cross legally decided to stay home.
Michelle Malkin must be especially pleased and proud of herself, but at what cost? Other groups are in danger too, not just Hispanics. How far has America come since World War II? Not far at all. This lack of progress suggests a troubling conclusion: Racist sentiment still continue towards Asians and Asian Americans even after the internment camps. On October 17, 2002, a federal district court in New Jersey issued an opinion that used language remarkably similar to that used in Korematsu. In Dasrath v. Continental Airlines, the court wrote:
[T]he objective assessment of a carrier's decision must take into account all the circumstances surrounding the decision, including...not least, the general security climate in which events unfold....In the present case, it should not be forgotten that the decisions at issue were made in an atmosphere pervaded by the fears and uncertainty's [sic] arising from the events of September 11, 2001.
In the Korematsu Case:
To cast this case into outlines of racial prejudice, without reference to the real military dangers which were presented, merely confuses the issue. Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race. He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire [and] because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures.
Both cases excused xenophobia.

In a recent email exchange I had with a friend, Rev Mykeru, on this issue, he provided me a link to James Spader's speech from Boston Legal. But its what Mykeru said that is so true- When will American have enough is not the question. It's how loud dumb-assed gimp pseudo-patriots can say "Thank you Sir, may I have another?


Read more!

 

Will the GOP Machine "Dixie-Chick" Jessica Simpson?

Two years ago, Dixie Chicks' Natalie Maines said that the band was "ashamed the President of the United States is from Texas" at a concert in London. They spoke their mind and the wingnuts went to town on them.

Fast forward to 2006. As if the Rethugs don't have anything better to do, but get their panties wadded up in a bunch when Jessica Simpson chose not to meet with the President.
Concerned about politicizing her favorite charity, singer-actress Jessica Simpson Wednesday turned down a invitation to meet with President Bush, a snub that left Republicans dismayed.
Her choice, right?...oops forgot, wingnuts don't believe in that when it comes to disagreeing with the Great Commander in Thief. So it is off to the smear races for the zombie ditto heads at Freepers R' Us the minute they found out the National Republican Congressional Committee didn't snag "the wholesome, blonde and buxom Jessica Simpson" as the Drudge Report put it.

It was a conspiracy, I tell ya!
To: BenLurkin

"Kinda up to her I guess"

Just wondering what her politics are. I got the impression she wanted to snub Pres. Bush publicly.
03/16/2006 5:49:46 AM PST by dynachrome

Funny how most wingnuts love to use those old tried and true sexist remarks when something doesn't come there way. Such as the ole that slut smear!
To: dynachrome

Another ditzy chick. Makes a living posing with come-hither looks over her shoulder. This is a talent? Never could understand the publicity.

But...First she agreed to meet the Pres...THEN she snubbed him.

Question for Ms S: Does this mean the fund raiser will accumulate more or less money for kids who need cleft surgery? If it means less money for the kids (almost certainly it does)...then you're disgracefully stupid and ought to make up the difference from your own pocketbook.

Question for the charity: Are you PAYING this bimbo to show up for publicity for the cause?

03/16/2006 5:52:06 AM PST by silverleaf
And when all the sexist comments have finished, it always comes back to the real reason why she chose not to attend - on no - she is brainwashed to be Democrat, but not just any Democrat - a Socialist Democrat.
To: dynachrome

I have no idea who she is, but such behavior demonstrates a lack of class. She must be a young person successfully indoctrinated to be a socialist democrat I would guess. The Democrats as a group, recently are publicly displaying callous, crude behavior uncharacteristic of a highly developed society; more like what you would expect in a third world country.

24 posted on 03/16/2006 5:54:59 AM PST by olezip
WTF??? So typical of them to vilify Simpson. GROW THE FUCK UP!! The wingnuttery klan were at it before Simpson, they took the liberty to vilified Tim McGraw and Faith Hill for critical for the slow response in Louisiana and Mississippi due to Katrina.

Whatever!


Read more!

Tuesday, March 14, 2006 

Michelle Malkin: How to Shortcut Family Time

Found this post on TBogg and I just had to share to demonstrate the constant hypocracy, especially when it deals with family moral values.

From TBogg's post:
Why does Michelle Malkin hate her children and not want to spend time with them?
Doug TenNapel, artist, musician, and animator extraordinaire (not to mention staunch conservative), has the parenting tip of the day.
The tip:
From time to time I have to play Candy Land with my kids. What was a magical, complicated game of my youth is a form of insipid torture for an adult. The game can last for an eternity. I mean literally an eternity.

My Beloved attends a MOPS (Mothers Of Pre-Schoolers) group at church and she picked up a great trick from one of the other mothers. Put the Queen Frostine card close to the top of the deck and when a child chooses this card they jump ahead nearly to the end of the board...limiting the parenting hell-on-earth known as Candy Land to a tolerable fifteen minute game.

The problem with the right wing in general, they adhere to a bunch of hollow claims on certain values. They claim believe in God - who who looks down on: those worshipping other gods, those who takes God's name in vain, those who don't honor thy father and thy mother, killing, adultery, and stealing.

It is bad enough the Shrill Queen is advocating cheating, but a church-based parenting group. Come on people, these are 3 to 6 year children, but nooo they have to justify by whining the game is too long. GROW THE FUCK UP!!!! And people wonder why kids are screaming bloody murder in the of some grocery store.

The problem, we live in a fast-pace, quick-fix society. We get bored way too easily. In short - speed rules.


The subliminal message wingnuts like Malkin, TenNapel, Mothers Of Pre-Schoolers of that church are sending to their zombie followers: Slow and steady does not win the race. Neither does skill acquisition or learning. Doesn't anybody every consider the social consequences it has for us all? Have we become a shortcut society?

In a pervious post, I mentioned David Callahan's "The Cheating Culture," Callahan writes that cheating is having an effect on our society, it has instilling in us a value that greed and ambition rule, and worse we are teaching our future that honesty isn't truly the best policy.

Callahan writes, "Young people see those who get to the top cut corners. It becomes the norm."

As long as this administration gets away with the crap they are doing and continue having shrill monsters like Malkin defending them, the fraudulent bar continues to be set higher and with a message of "only pansies plays by the rules." Way to go Malkin!

From Christianity Today:
If cheating is taking inappropriate shortcuts to achieve a good, even a holy end, much of evangelical Christianity stands guilty. We read one-minute Bibles, pray through five-minute devotions, or wander from one conference to another to get five keys to spiritual success. We expect spiritual maturity in 40 purpose-filled studies. Though such resources are designed as milk for the immature, we fear they are viewed as the meat of discipleship by too many.


But the biggest crime - not wanting to spend your time with your own child.


Read more!

Monday, March 13, 2006 

Gale Norton's Connection to Jack Abramoff

Recently, Interior Secretary Gale Norton, a former Colorado attorney general, announced her resignation and will be leaving the Interior Department at the of the month (Norton's resignation letter). Norton will be leaving with a controversial record which includes clashes with environmentalists and American Indian groups. While, at the same time receiving praises from the oil industry.
Ms. Norton, who turns 52 on Saturday, has been on the job for five years and was at the nexus of many controversies, including drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other sensitive areas, administration of the Endangered Species Act, handling of trust money for Indian tribes, and collection of royalties due the federal government for natural gas drilling on public lands.
As interior secretary she was in charge over the department that is currently being investigated for possible ties to the corruption scandal involving Jack Abramoff. Even though her Department is currently being investigated, Norton denies that the investigation played a role in her resignation, claiming that she just wanted "to return to having a private life again."

(more below the fold)

Jack Abramoff, Norton and Department of Inferior

Norton's problems began in 2005 when her name was mentioned during Abramoff's investigation. And it now looks like the noose is getting tighter for her this year.

Earlier this year, White House officials tried to put some distance themselves from Jack Abramoff. So obvious, Scott McClellan, White House press secretary, said "The President does not know him, nor does the President recall ever meeting him." In mid-January, Time dropped a bombshell on the White House when they disclosed they had five photos of Abramoff and Dubya together. There, the White House tried spinning the pictures as a mere coincidence because the pictures in question were taken at a "Christmas-party line, where the President poses with hundreds of people." And in a press conference held in January, Dudya told reporters "You know, I, frankly, don't even remember having my picture taken with the guy. I don't know him."


In February, Time published the pictures in question. McClellan claimed the White House had "no record" told told TIME:
The President has taken countless, tens of thousands of pictures at home and abroad over the last five years. As we've said previously a photo like this has no relevance to the Justice Department's investigation [of Abramoff].
Considering the White House has aggressively downplayed the situation, one has to wonder, how close is the relationship between Dubya and Jack Abramoff? In addition to the photos, it was previously reported in the Texas Observer that Jack Abramoff was member of the Bush Administration's 2001 Transition Advisory Team. The Observer wrote:
He had just concluded his work on the Bush Transition Team as an advisor to the Department of the Interior. He had sent his personal assistant Susan Ralston to the White House to work as Rove's personal assistant. He was a close friend, advisor, and high-dollar fundraiser for the most powerful man in Congress, Tom DeLay.
In May 2005, USA Today reported:
...documents show [Abramoff's] team also had extensive access to Bush administration officials, meeting with Cheney policy advisers Ron Christie and Stephen Ruhlen, Ashcroft at the Justice Department, White House intergovernmental affairs chief Ruben Barrales, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick, Deputy Interior Secretary Steven Griles and others.


Most of the contacts were handled by Abramoff's subordinates, who then reported back to him on the meetings. Abramoff met several times personally with top Interior officials, whose Office of Insular Affairs oversees the Mariana Islands and other U.S. territories.

Recently released e-mails by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee show that Abramoff began his involvement with the Interior Department since day one of the BushCo Administration. Abramoff's main contact in the Interior Department was Italia Federici, a former political aide to Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton and current president of the Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy (CREA).

On January 30, 2001,- the same day Interior Secretary Gale Norton was confirmed by the Senate - Abramoff wrote Federici (click here for image):

Thanks of much Italia. Please let me know what I can do to help Dennis Stephens, Mark Zachares (Office of Insular Affairs) and Tim Martin (Bureau of Indian Affairs) be placed. Look forward to hearing form you regarding CREA. Regards.
According to USA Today, Coalition of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy (CREA) was founded in 1999 by Secretary Norton, Federici and Grover Norquist.
Federici helped Norton raise money for an unsuccessful bid for a Senate seat in Colorado and she, Norquist and Norton formed CREA in 1999 as a tax-exempt organization highlighting Republican ideas for the environment.
As expected, Federici denies any wrongdoing, however, her emails between her and Abramoff paint a different picture.

In a March 1, 2001 email, Federici invited Abramoff to a "small cocktail party" so he could meet Secretary Norton. Federici also mentions the outcome of the first meeting between Abramoff and Griles and how Griles was pleased with Abramoff's "advice" on BIA. She also told Abramoff "You definitely made another friend." Abramoff replied excited about the invitation and offered to help out on the cost of the party.

According to the Department of Interior, Deputy Secretary Steven Griles oversaw two of the bureaus Abramoff had his eyes on, Bureau of Indian Affairs and Office of Insular Affairs.
The Deputy Secretary is second in command in the Department and has policy and administrative responsibility for assisting the Secretary in managing the Department's eight bureaus: the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Minerals Management Service, Office of Surface Mining, U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Reclamation and the Office of Insular Affairs.
On the same day, Federici sends seris of emails to an unidentified person letting them know Abramoff has requested an invoice. Also on the same day in another email, Abramoff asked Federici for a favor, Abramoff wanted to know if Secretary Norton or Griles could help out one of his clients. One can assume the name crossed out is Secretary Norton because one of those emails Federici notifies the person whos name is crossed out that "Steve" has taken care of the "matter."

In the same month, a fax was sent from Kathryn Fowler Van Hoof, the LA Coushattas' attorney, requesting a payment of $50,000 to "pay 1/2 the cost of a poll conducted by the Council for Republican Environmental Advocacy, which is being conducted on behalf of Gayle Norton, Secretary of Interior." Interestingly, in May 2001, CREA provided the Interior Department the findings from their focus groups. The findings "suggests how to talk about energy issues, emphasizes using rising gas prices to promote increased drilling" - according to documents obtained by the National Resources Defense Council.
The research concludes, "language that . . . emphasizes price increases in gasoline and natural gas and the California situation resonates with voters." Another finding: "Gasoline price stability is the single most potent argument for opening up ANWR."
Additional emails provide evidence Norton and Griles were also involved with Abramoff in bilking the Native Americans. Abramoff and his associated often describe Griles as "Our guy." In an email exchange between Todd Boulanger, of Cassidy and Associates Inc and Abramoff, the emails indicate the funds were used so tribal leaders could meet Norton face-to-face at one of Norton's "dinner of the trustees." Abramoff explained to Boulanger that each tribe contributes $50,000 to Norton's organization CREA, which "she supports still."
Abramoff Arranged A White House Meeting With Bush And Administration Officials For Indian Leaders. In the summer of 2001, Abramoff arranged a meeting between Bush and top Indian leaders to discuss tax issues. Among the attendees was one of Abramoff's biggest clients, Lovelin Poncho, chairman of the Coushattas. Abramoff also invited the Coushattas and other tribal clients to a fall 2001 dinner party attended by Interior Secretary Gale Norton. [National Journal, 4/20/02]
So did Norton resign because the Abramoff scandal noose was getting tighter? Maybe so, but that really is besides the point. History is filled with many examples how people can be easily fooled by smooth talking snake-oil salesmen like P.T. Barnum. Barnum is often credited with the quote "There's a sucker born every minute," a motto Jack Abramoff evidently lives by. Greed does not even comes close to describing Abramoff's motive and those who participated this criminal act and this will go down in history as one of sadest period in US history. No matter how much Secretary Norton denies her involvement, the evidence proves otherwise. And like the popular Nigerian email scam, she was as much a part of Abramoff scam that bilked the Native Americas.

Update On Abramoff's "Placed" People
Dennis Stephens, is currently employed in Abramoff's old employer Preston Gates & Ellis LLP and serves has their government affairs counselor. According to the agency's profile, Stephens has worked as a legislative assistant for Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX) and as the legislative director for Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA)and Rep. Roger Wicker (R-MS).

Mark Zachares currently serves as a legislative assistant for Rep Don Young (R-AK). Last year, the Los Angeles Times wrote Mark Zachares had joined Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.) on a trip to Scotland that was also paid by Abramoff. The Times also mentioned.
Zachares, now a top staffer on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, once served as a labor and immigration official in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory. Abramoff represented the territory and its apparel manufacturers at the time.
Tim Martin was not given the BIA position, however, he did serve as the Executive Director, United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc (USET) who also sat on The Tribal Leaders/ Department of the Interior Trust Reform Task Force. USET's web site states:
United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc's is a non-profit, inter-tribal organization that collectively represents its member Tribes at the regional and national level. USET has grown to include twenty-four federally recognized Tribes, operating through various workgroups and committees and providing a forum for the exchange of ideas and information amongst Tribes, agencies and governments.
USET includes several of Abramoff's clients Cherokee, the Mississippi Band of Choctaw, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. The purpose of the Tribal Leaders/ Department of the Interior Trust Reform Task Force was to "bring the tribal leaders and Interior officials together to repair the way tribal members' trust fund accounts are handled."


Technorati : , ,


Read more!

Saturday, March 11, 2006 

La Raza Unida Nunca Sera Vencida

That was from yesterdays rally where 100,000 pro-immigration supporters marched into downtown Chicago to show their support for immigrant rights.
"Raise those American flags!" shouted U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Democrat. "This is our country, and this is where we will stay."

So to all Hatin' Xenophobic, Jingoistic, Racist, Rat Bastards get over yourselves!!

The sleeping giant has awakened! Hoy Marchamos! Manana Votamos!

[Update: More information on the march.]
From the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights.

But that is not the only place a march has taken place. The article goes one to mention other marches.
  • Last week 5,000 Mexicans gathered in Oregon;
  • March 6, some 30,000 Latinos from the Washington, D.C.

It seems those numbers I quoted from the AP is underestimated. Chicago Police estimated the crowd at 300,000!!!
As CBS 2 Chief Correspondent Jay Levine reports, the protesters -- of Polish, Irish, Latino, Chinese and many other nationalities -- gathered at Union Park, at Ashland Avenue and Lake Street, and marched to the Loop. From the air, it appeared to be an endless sea of demonstrators, flooding the streets to protest the recently-passed house bill, which would make it a crime to hire or even help undocumented immigrants.

(click to view video)





Read more!

Friday, March 10, 2006 

Have a Great Weekend, Y'all


Read more!

Thursday, March 09, 2006 

Bush's "With Us or Against Us" Foriegn Policy and "The Great Border Wall"

Since coming into office in 2001, the Bush administration has consistently opposed to having the International Criminal Court, based in The Hague, hold US military and political leaders to a uniform global standard of justice. The court was set up to prosecute individuals accused of the world's worst atrocities -- genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity -- in a belated effort to fulfill the promise of the Nuremberg trials, which tried Nazi leaders after World War II. The Bush argues that the court, could be used for frivolous or politically motivated prosecutions of U.S. troops.

BushCo has aggressively negotiated bilateral agreements with other countries to insure immunity of US nationals from prosecution by the Court. Sadly, BushCo is willingly to play the school yard bully to dozens of other poor countries by cutting off foreign aid, foreign trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) for defying the US because of their support for the International Criminal Court.

Last fall, Mexico became a signatory to the ICC making them the 12th country from the Latin America-Caribbean area to be punished under the U.S. American Service-Members' Protection Act. This law prohibits US military assistance to countries that have not signed "Article 98" agreements. An “Article 98” agreement is the agreement between the US and those countries who pledge not to seek the prosecution of US citizens in the International Criminal Court.

Countries that refused to sign and ratify Article 98 agreements lost the military aid and those countries who were not willing to stand up to the US were not sanctioned. The following are the types of aid BushCo will cut off: International Military Education and Training (IMET), Foreign Military Financing (FMF), Excess Defense Articles (EDA) and non-drug Emergency Drawdown Authority funds (506(b)). Section 574 of the 2005 Foreign Operations Appropriations law (P.L. 108-447), a provision that adds an economic-aid program, Economic Support Funds (ESF).

U.S. military aid is a key component to Mexican security in combating drug trafficking. The U.S. did warn Mexico that joining the ICC would lead to the cut of an $11.5 million program to help its justice system deal with drug trafficking. According to the Seattle Times, Mexico could lose almost 40% in US economic aid if it decided to defy the US.

It is interesting that last December, Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-Colorado) and his anti-reconquista rough rides of the House passed their fascist "getting tough" immigration policy, HR 4437 - the bill that would build a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border - rather quickly. It just proves that ignorance can only be accompanied by bliss. And it is also interesting, Congress voted to give themselves a $3,000-a-year pay raise, which became effective just in time for the holidays.

The obvious question is, how was that possible, if this (un)free nation is in debt? Another question that could be asked, what programs got cut. Since October, when Mexico decided to defy BushCo, the relationship between Mexico and the US have been strained. One possible explanation, the US did cut foreign aid to Mexico. According to the Houston Chronicle, today, "the sanctions have been imposed without an official announcement." Not only will BushCo take their marbles and go home, but they don't have to tell anybody when they are going home. Mexico is not the only country try in Latin America that Bush decided to punish.
ICC-related sanctions have cut the roster of trainees from the hemisphere by almost 800 over the past few years, eroding the traditionally deep ties between the U.S. and Latin American militaries.

Worldwide, about two dozen countries have been sanctioned by the U.S.
Despite being cut off and suffering the consequences, Mexico will not back down and sign the "Article 98" agreement. President Vicente Fox's spokesman, Ruben Aguilar, said
"Mexico will be irrefutable in supporting the protocols of the international court, whatever the cost. Nobody in the world should be immune from the action of justice."
One has to wonder, if the sanctions didn't force Mexico to sign the agreement, was HR 4437 the next move by BushCo? In July 2004, the House attached an anti-ICC amendment, the Nethercutt Amendment, to the FY05 Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (H.R. 4818). The Nethercutt Amendment was named after the Congressman who introduced it, the amendment would cut ESFs to all countries that belong to the ICC but have not signed the "Article 98" agreement with the US. The Nethercutt language has again been included in the House version of the Fiscal Year 2006 (FY06) Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill, H.R. 3057.

The Nethercutt provision in FY06 provides waivers for NATO Allies, key non-NATO allies, and other countries if the President determines that it is in the national interests of the US. Like the American Servicemembers Protection Act, the Nethercutt threatens to withhold military aid to countries that are party to the ICC. According to the Citizens for Global Solutions, Bush has not invoked any waivers yet.

And according the Chronicle, Bush will be meeting with Mexico's President Vicente Fox at the end of the month. Once again, the school yard bully is kicking sand, sign the agreement or the wall will be built.


Read more!

Wednesday, March 08, 2006 

A Fight For Our Own Existence: An Open Letter To All

To my fellow brothers and sisters, mi bloggers, mi gente, mi raza, and anyone who is tired of the status quo:

Aren't you tired, of living just to get by? Isn’t it time to say enough? We have to say ¡Basta! ¡NO MAS!

Man Eegee has put up a great post, From the Screen to the Streets, one in with I agree.
The time has come for us to say "Enough is Enough" and take the collective outrage and frustration we've been building up for the past five years to the streets. It is time to shatter the Rubberstamp Congress and demand an end to the fascist tyranny of the Bush misAdministration.

Working alone, we can only do what we can do, but working together we have the opportunity to awaken the power of the people and restore balance to our democracy. You have to believe it to make it happen. I am asking you to believe.

Take the anger, take the frustration, take the pain, take your memories, your stories, and channel it into a force for Change. It can happen, but we have to believe in ourselves. I believe in our power, because I read it everyday. Stories of violation, shame, pain, and silence, yet the stories never end there. They end in a firm resolve to never let the outrage happen again, the passion of an activist that spreads like fire from the screens of our computers. I know, because I have caught that flame from many of you.

What are your gifts?

Are you a photographer? Then take a picture of the beauty of this world and attach a message regarding the destruction of our environment. Send it to all of your friends along with a voter registration card or contact info to sign them up to vote.

Are you a painter? Create a masterpiece mural and hang it with pride, allowing your statement of dissent to reach the eyes of the sleeping voters of this country.

Are you a teacher? Ignite that flame of activism in your students. Make them understand that there is a crisis. Tell the stories that validate our greatest fears that the United States is on the edge of a knife and that it will take their voice, their push, that will help us keep from falling off the edge of full-blown fascism.

Are you an organizer and a leader? Get yourself to your local precinct meetings and run for office. Take the donkey by its ears and force it in the direction you wish it to go. Don't let them sideline you, demand a hearing for your complaints and offer your ideas for a better way. Make it happen.

Are you a writer, like me? Then use your gift of words and help change the wind of the newspapers across this country. Send your letters to the editors to local rags that reach the small towns, villages and parishes across the land. Make your voice heard, in the best way you know how, by utilizing your gifts.

We can not let the status quo remain in place.
America is failing us, it is sick and riddled with a cancer eating at the true morals we once held dear. And our death will soon come. The future will never know how good we had it. George Orwell once wrote:
The Party could thrust its hand into the past and say of this or that event, it never happened....And if all others accepted the lie whith the Party imposed -- if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past,....controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'
Remember these words, burn them into you memory, say it every day if you need too. If you need an example to make you remember it and motivated, them remember Tom DeLay. With everything he did in the past, which could have him go to jail, he still won the fucking primary.
DeLay won 62 percent of the vote in the 22nd Congressional District, which covers parts of Harris, Brazoria, Fort Bend and Galveston counties...
That is four counties who voted for this thief, this school bully - the same bully you ran away from in your youth. The same one you vowed one day to take a stand. The time is now! He is now running your life. We will soon grow older and try to reflect our past by trying to answer this simple question, "Was life better before BushCo than it is now?" We try to warn our children and grand children, but it all will cease because that one question that keeps us going in this fight will soon be unanswerable. Not because of some conspiracy theory of mind control, but because we as a society will soon be incapable of comparing one era with another. For example:
The survey "shows an extraordinary number of high school students consider their constitutional right to freedom of speech to be excessive," the editorial voice of the Christian Science Monitor noted (Feb. 14). "And as if that response isn't disturbing enough---some 75 percent of the students either took the First Amendment for granted or had no opinion about it at all. About half the students surveyed thought the US government could actually censor the Internet; two-thirds thought it was illegal to burn the US flag."
Our future will soon forget what a true America really was about because our history is being re-defined and our definition of moral standards will never be compared since it will soon be gone.

For those of you how have read Orwell's 1984, how many of you remember reading George Orwell's 1984 and saying to yourself, "Naw, that will never happen"? It is happening now. For those of you who haven't read it, read it. And ask yourself, Is this how you want to live?

The cancers of greed and deception is taking over and now is the time to fight for our lives, our children's lives and their children's. Are you willing to give them a life where they have to live like a good little sheep, being told "what to wear" "where to live" "what to learn" "what to read" and on on? There comes a point we all have to yell out "ENOUGHHHHHH!!!!!!"

We may not be able to win within our life time, but we can give our future the tools to fight the tyranny that is starting to take over.

¡Viva la Revolución! ¡Para Tierra, Justicia y Libertad!


Read more!

Sunday, March 05, 2006 

The Hispanic Paradox

Who should this country blame for the higher cost of living, rising gas prices, higher insurance premiums, global warming and this Administration corruptions? Ah yes, its those damn border crossers. Send them hell back!

It always seems like whenever something goes wrong in the United States, immigrants are the first to be blamed or suspected. Basta!

Beginning last year, the wing-nut experiment in extralegal policing by the xenophobic dumbfuck version of the Nazi stormtroopers - Minutemen - began "patrolling" the borders from lazy, shiftless, drug smuggling South-of-the-Border varmints. If that is not bad enough, they are now found "other ways" to take care of the immigration problems, they have taken to chasing day laborers at pickup sites.

The muscle for outright oppression of anyone who hasn't savored the wingnut kool-aid is already being rehearsed in the form of racist paramilitary groups like the Minutemen. To show that the US is "getting tough," last December, the anti-reconquista brigades in the House passed their draconian legislation, H.R. 4437. If passed by the Senate, the new law will now make felons of all undocumented immigrants as well as persons who assist them. Pat Buchanan's wet dream come true.

Worst yet, these fascist assholes, wrap themselves around the American flag, crying foul if anyone dares to call the racists. Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-Colorado), the Lou Dobbs of the House, wrote one of his fascist op-ed propaganda pieces in the L.A. Times:
People who say it's racist to want secure borders are insulting the intelligence of the American people, and such charges betray an empty arsenal of serious arguments.
Tancredo and his rag-tag trigger happy white, jack-booted, skinhead army continue to beat the drum that securing the borders isn't racist. But it is wingnuts lunitics like Tancredo that treat assholes running around with guns as real patriots. Is it a coincidence that racist-affiliated right wing groups like the Minutemen are being mainstreamed at the same time that time that other members of the racist-affiliated right wing are trying to restore the reputation of Joe McCarthy? Some pundits have argued that internment camps were and are a good idea while pieces of race-baiting, academic jihadist shit like David Horowitz have constructed an entire bogus database, DiscoverTheNetwork.org, connecting anyone left to terrorism. That is just the tip of the "race-baiting iceberg," there are subtle messages being spread widely and effectively distributed by think tanks, academics, radio pundits and right-wing politicians, who have created an industry that interprets whiteness in an unprecedented context - in which many whites feel uncomfortably surrounded by "minorities." Take the California Coalition for Immigration Reform (CCIR), on there website one can find propaganda bullshit trying to insight fear with their faux public-policy observations, such as their xenophobic view on Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa - Meet the Mechista Weasel who Wants to Be L.A's Next Mayorista. Or on AmericanPatrol.com, where they urged people "Help keep this Mexican nationalist out of the L.A. mayor's office," in last year's mayoral race. As I stated before, the anti-illegal-immigration movement is sweeping the country like wildfire. Some of the more asinine comments about groups like the Minutemen have been compared as a Neighborhood Watch program.

Over twenty years ago, a researcher at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston coined the phrase the "Hispanic paradox" - the tendency for Hispanic people to have lower than average rates of some chronic illnesses despite the fact that many of them live in relatively poor social or economic conditions. At the heart of the anti-immigration debate resides a distinct paradox. As Merriam-Webster defines it a paradox is an idea, thought, or accepted notion that may be contrary to the truth.

The "Hispanic Paradox" is that the country's political culture cannot function without scapegoating migrant laborers either. America's fear of immigrants is not new. In the 1920s, Congress passed Immigration Act of 1924, which placed immigration quotas that barred Asians, Italians, Greeks, and Jews. These quota laws, passed after lobbying by the Ku Klux Klan, Immigration Restriction League and others, codified the eugenics theories of Madison Grant, whose work focused on the supposedly inferior skull sizes of Jews and other immigrants.

To begin with, immigrants have contributed to the United States experience of its last economic boom and this country can continue to recover from its current crisis thanks in part to their contributions as well. There is a tendency to argue that immigrants take from this country much more than they give. This is myth created by many neo-cons to create anti-immigrants sentiments. Here are some facts about the jobs we are stealing:
  • 162,000 work in nation’s miscellaneous agricultural industry;
  • 161,000 are maids and housekeepers;
  • 132,000 are grounds keepers;
  • 174,000 are construction workers;
  • 114,000 are production workers;
  • 194,000 of the nation’s cooks, and
  • 153,000 of the nation’s janitors.
It is easy to marginalize and demonize them economically and socially. The most comprehensive study on this subject has been done by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). The NAS clearly establishes that legal and illegal immigrants combined contribute more than 10 billion dollars to the U.S. economy annually. They also found that immigrants are necessary to avoid inflation and to keep prices low. Without immigrants, a tomato might cost $5; a hamburger $20; a filet mignon $50; and Americans would have to pay two or three times more to rent or buy a house. The NAS also have suggested the United States needs more immigrants - who of course pay taxes and create jobs - to support the rapidly aging baby-boomers.

War does not always take the form of tanks and bombs. They self-righteously bombarding the airwaves of some faux "invasion" of the United States by undocumented workers, sending fear to the suburbs by evoking images of drug use, crime, and forked-tongues. Americans are "smothered" by their own media. So, how much you want to bet that the suburban wingnut would have a problem with out of state scumbags descending on their neighborhoods fully armed?

Mi gente, this is their war on all of us, and it is a class war that seeks to divide this nation into two classes: Rich and poor. And if you are poor you will also have no rights. Ask yourself this, do you really think things will get better? If you are one of the many just trying to get by, I am sorry my friend you are like many of us Xicanos. You can kick out all the Hispanics, but you will never belong in their demographic. Make no mistake about it, those now in power do not care about you! How much more suffering will we have to endure at the hands of these dirty greedy bastards who have no morals, conscience, or values other than benefiting themselves?

They talk about crime and taking jobs away. It is not the immigrants who are outsourcing American jobs, its the Wal-Mart Republicans. The Republicans continue to succeed in propagandizing to the American public into believing that they and they alone can keep America secure, there's no reason why the "War on Terror" should ever have to end. In fact, by giving the right-wing a monopoly on "keeping America safe" it would make sense for them, in terms of maintaining power, to allow just enough terrorist attacks against the American civilian population, or at least the perception of its imminence, to keep up a level of hysteria without also making themselves seem incompetent.

While all this happy horseshit is being flung against the wall, almost completely ignored are the atrocities occurring in Iraq.

America is beginning to default on its promissory note insofar as democracy is concerned. We have been given a bad check, a check which has come back marked insufficient funds. Now is the time to make real on the promises of democracy! Now is the time to make justice a reality!


Read more!

About me

  • I'm XicanoPwr
  • From Tejas, United States
  • Un Xicano who is tired of the current status quo.
My profile

Freedom Fighters

Cost of the War in Iraq

(JavaScript Error)

Archives

Email me:
chicano@At(xicanopwr)d.ot.com
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates
Today's Gas Prices